During which situation might continuous electronic fetal monitoring be preferred?

Continuous electronic fetal monitoring is preferred in high-risk pregnancies because it provides real-time data on the fetal heart rate and contraction patterns. This constant surveillance allows healthcare providers to promptly identify any signs of fetal distress or complications that may arise during labor. In high-risk situations, such as those involving pre-existing maternal conditions, abnormal fetal growth, or previous pregnancy complications, the stakes are higher, and continuous monitoring can be crucial in making timely interventions that can improve outcomes for both the mother and the fetus.

In contrast, low-risk pregnancies typically do not necessitate the intensity of continuous monitoring, as the likelihood of complications is significantly reduced. While continuous monitoring might be used for all deliveries in certain settings, it is not generally the preferred method for every situation. Additionally, intermittent monitoring may be suitable for mothers who wish to have more mobility during labor, but in high-risk cases, the benefits of continuous observation outweigh the convenience of intermittent approaches.